The IOC sat idly by while Russia passed anti-gay legislation that mocked the Olympic Charter; spent an estimated $51 billion (a big chunk apparently lining the pockets of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s oligarch biddies); despoiled the environment; and left sports venues and high-end hotels that may be used sparingly, if at all, in years to come.
So it seemed a combination of both irony and coincidence that the application filing date for potential 2022 Winter Games host cities was last Friday.
Five cities applied.
The shame is the best possible candidate isn’t in a race that will end with a July 31, 2015 IOC vote.
There is one great candidate among the five: Oslo, Norway. There is another candidate, Almaty, Kazakhstan, that sadly could become the favorite if the good people of Norway remain properly skeptical about funding the idea.
A Winter Games in Kazakhstan, seen by Transparency International as one of the world’s most corrupt countries and run by a Putin-style strongman, Nursultan Nazarbayev, would make the financial excesses and improprieties of Sochi seem like pocket change.
The other applicants: Lviv, Ukraine (excuse the bitter laughter); Krakow, Poland, which proposes having some events in another country, Slovakia; and Beijing, which would have some mountain events 150 miles away in Zhangjiakou, and all outdoor competitions would be invisible given the levels of winter air pollution in both places.
And the best possible candidate, for 2022, 2026, whenever?
It is where the IOC would go if its pledges to reduce fiscal insanity, leave a sustainable legacy and minimize environmental impact were more than idle words.
It is where the IOC would go if it could recognize its own hypocrisy.
It is Salt Lake City, host of the 2002 Winter Olympics.
Every sports venue from the 2002 Olympics still is being widely used, nearly all for the same sort of high-level international competition, many for training of both elite and young athletes, others for recreation, some (like Soldier Hollow) for both summer and winter activities. Sochi Olympic champions including Ted Ligety, Sage Kotsenburg and Joss Christensen all developed in the Salt Lake area.
That was the vision Salt Lake City presented in its bid, and it may be the only former Olympic host where that vision has been fully realized.
That includes usual Winter Olympic white elephants like a sliding center and a ski jump hill – both very much alive at the Utah Olympic Park in Park City.
Only the downhill / Super-G courses at Snowbasin have not been re-used for elite competition, because the ski area’s late owner, Earl Holding, chose not to make them available. If Snowbasin did not want to be part of another Olympic bid, there are other slopes in the Park City / Deer Valley area that could handle the Alpine speed events.
The advantages Salt Lake City always had are still there: airport with a wide range of destinations, typically excellent snow conditions, ease of access to venues (Soldier Hollow, home to Nordic skiing and biathlon, was the only venue more than an hour from downtown Salt Lake), plenty of spectator and media housing.
An Olympic Village would be the only major construction needed.
All 2,200 rooms in the 2002 athletes’ village have become student housing at the University of Utah, allowing it to move away from being thought of as a commuter school. It would welcome a chance to get more housing with similar financial help from another Olympic organizing committee.
"The University of Utah is a different place because of the opportunity we got from the Olympics," said Jerry Basford, associate vice-president for student affairs.