Can Paul Vallas possibly play second banana?
Though I know Vallas well, even I can't answer that one. And I doubt Gov. Pat Quinn knows either. When I interview both men this week, I'll ask them.
Whether Vallas can rein in his personality is a question, yes.
But for Quinn, Vallas might already be the answer to his re-election.
Quinn shocked the political establishment last week when he named Vallas as his running mate for lieutenant governor.
"Gov. Quinn has put together a very strong ticket," said Gery Chico, a Vallas ally who was Chicago school board president when Vallas was the Chicago schools CEO. "Paul is one of the most talented people I've ever worked with. He's got an intimate knowledge of state government and state finance and education. He brings strength."
Yes, but he also brings risk. Vallas is not your average second banana. He's not a second banana, period. The mercurial Vallas should have been elected governor over Rod Blagojevich in 2002. If Vallas had won, his lieutenant governor would have been Pat Quinn.
But back then, the regular Chicago Democrats sliced Vallas up. And Vallas left town for school reform jobs in Philadelphia, New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina, Haiti and most recently Connecticut.
Blagojevich left town, too, eventually, for the federal penitentiary in Englewood, Colo.
The safe choice for Quinn last week, according to the common wisdom, would have been an African-American Democrat as his running mate. There were good candidates available. City Treasurer Stephanie Neely and state Sen. Kwame "The Kwamenator" Raoul come to mind.
Both are qualified. Each should eventually win higher office. I can see either one as mayor of Chicago someday, although with the city's bond debt approaching $20 billion, I don't know who'd want the job.
No one would have been surprised if Raoul or Neely or a like candidate had been put on Quinn's ticket. And the Republican candidates would have yawned.
But Quinn didn't make the safe choice. Instead, he chose Vallas, the nationally known school reformer, budget hawk and former Chicago schools chief. And the Republicans didn't yawn.
Instead, both businessman Bruce Rauner and state Sen. Kirk Dillard issued statements trying to knock Vallas. Opposing candidates hardly ever notice some obscure running mate in another party, at least publicly.
The eagles don't hunt flies.
But for Dillard and Rauner to react this way tells me something. It tells me Vallas bothers them. And with good reason.
Independent suburbanites most likely will make the difference in the gubernatorial election, particularly suburban women. Vallas, who did well in the suburbs in his losing 2002 Democratic campaign for governor, is publicly identified with two issues important to suburban women: fiscal responsibility and education.
Vallas plays well in the suburbs. He's known. He's already defined himself. And that demographic of fiscally conservative suburban social moderates is the one that Rauner is trying to reach.
What surprises me is that Rauner didn't get Vallas on his side. Vallas had soured on the Democrats after the 2002 campaign, and even considered running as a Republican for the Cook County Board. The two of them — with their knowledge of budgets and finance — would have been formidable.
Remember that in 2002, Vallas had already fallen out with then-Mayor Richard Daley. Daley had isolated him. And Daley's brother William toyed with the idea of running for governor, and big-money types paused for a bit, not knowing whether the Boss' brother was serious.