Financial planners say they are having discussions regularly with clients about the impasse in Congress over the vote to raise the amount the government can borrow so it can continue to pay all its bills. Clients fear that politicians won't reach a deal in time, causing the country to default on its obligations — and, economists say, wreaking havoc on the global economy.
- Consuming Interests: 40 percent of wealthy would go along with higher taxes to protect entitlements
- Z on TV: TV press doing the job on debt ceiling
- Editorial: Boehner holds the key to debt limit talks
- Pictures: Tips to cut down your grocery bill
- How to find bargains
- 10 places (beside the newspaper) to find coupons
See more photos »
"He said, 'I can't go through another 2008,'" Brown says.
The government spends more than it takes in, and thus has to borrow to meet its obligations. In the past, lawmakers — even some Republicans now at the center of standoff — have raised the amount the government can borrow as a matter of routine.
Treasury Department officials say they need Congress to pass legislation now to raise the $14.29 trillion debt ceiling by Aug. 2 so the country can avoid defaulting for the first time in history.
But Republicans now are demanding that any increase in the debt ceiling be tied to spending cuts to reduce the federal deficit.
President Barack Obama has countered with a larger $4 trillion deficit reduction proposal that would include tax increases and cuts to entitlement programs. But Republicans refuse to go along with any tax increases, and some Democrats now say they'll vote against reductions to Social Security or Medicare.
The standoff prompted the Moody's Investor Service and Standard & Poor's to announce last week that it was looking at the possibility of downgrading the nation's gold-plated credit rating.
It's a fine mess — and one that's totally unnecessary.
Granted, the United States needs to reduce its deficit and get a handle on entitlement programs, particularly Medicare. But the way it's being played out in Washington — holding the debt ceiling hostage — is a cruel game of chicken that's causing small investors to fret when they shouldn't have to.
Robert Ramsay, a retired naval officer in Seabeck, Wash., called his investment adviser this month concerned that the stock market could be headed for a crash. He wanted to know what he and his wife could do to protect themselves. The 66-year-old has recovered almost all of the money he lost in the 2008 market crash and didn't want to risk losing it again.
Adding to his concerns, Ramsay and his wife receive military pensions, and he gets Social Security benefits. Obama warned last week that he can't guarantee that the federal government will send those checks out next month if the debt ceiling isn't raised. Ramsay says he and his wife would have to dip into savings to pay bills.
The retiree went through his options with the adviser, who persuaded Ramsay not to change his portfolio.
Indeed, financial planners say, the best course of action for small investors now is to stick with their long-term investment plan, instead of trying to time when to get in and out of the market.
Economists and financial professionals predict that reason ultimately will prevail, and Congress will raise the debt ceiling.
And so far, they note, the markets seem to agree. Stocks haven't taken a dive. The yield on 10-year Treasuries remains low, a sign that the government hasn't had to raise rates to attract nervous buyers.
"Why are people continuing to buy Treasuries if they think the U.S. will default?" asks Rockville planner Brown.
The assumption is that Congress will raise the debt limit because the consequences of not doing so are so severe.