Airlines based in the Arab states of the Persian Gulf have been buying up huge fleets of the biggest planes around -- the Airbus 380 and Boeing 777. Some of you have asked me what's going on with these lines -- their home countries are very small and don't generate much outbound or inbound traffic -- so why are they growing so big, so fast? Because this is a slow week for travel news, it's maybe a good time to look at one of the more interesting developments in international aviation.
Three airlines based in the Gulf states have attracted the most attention:
-- Etihad, based in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, is also buying up lots of the biggest planes.
-- Qatar Airways, based in Doha, Qatar, like Etihad, is catching up rapidly.
Not only are these lines among the major buyers of the latest, biggest planes, they generally earn high marks in passenger surveys. Currently, Qatar is one of only six "Five-star" airlines in the Skytrax index, and Emirates and Etihad are both among the 32 four-star lines. (In case you were wondering, no airline based in North America or Europe warrants five Skytrax stars, and the only North American airlines to earn even four are JetBlue and Porter.)
Their home countries are economically important as banking and commerce centers, have lots of oil, and enjoy among the world's highest per-capita incomes, but none has either the base populations or tourist centers to warrant such huge airline operations. And local origin/destination traffic isn't their target market. Instead, they're betting big on operating as giant hubs between Europe and Asia/Oceania. And so far, this strategy is working.
You're familiar with the pattern here in the United States. All three of the giant legacy lines operate one or more hubs somewhere near the middle of the country -- American in Chicago and Dallas, Delta in Minneapolis, Detroit, and Atlanta, and United in Chicago and Denver -- where they can collect and connect traffic from major cities to the east and west and provide flights from almost everywhere to almost everywhere with one well-timed connection.
That's what Emirates, Etihad, and Qatar are doing on a longer-range scale. They fly nonstop to their hub airports from a bunch of cities in Asia, the South Pacific, and East Africa; exchange traffic in those base cities; and fly the connecting passengers to Europe and North America. To be sure, some of those routes are busy enough to warrant nonstop flights, but lots more combinations require hubbing somewhere, and the Persian Gulf is an ideal location for it.
A case in point is the new agreement between Qantas and Emirates. At present, no transport plane can economically make it nonstop between eastern Australia and most of Western Europe, and London-Sydney is probably the only route in that part of the world that could support frequent nonstops in any case. So to serve such markets as Amsterdam, Frankfurt, and Paris, Qantas has to stop somewhere. It has been stopping at Singapore and Hong Kong, but that pattern hasn't worked well. So Qantas will probably stop flying to many European cities other than London, and will instead fly to Dubai, where Emirates will take them the rest of the way. And it doesn't hurt that Emirates generally rates higher than Qantas for service.
Obviously, travelers between America and Eastern Europe won't go as far out of the way as Dubai for a connection. But if you're headed for the Indian subcontinent, Middle East, or West Africa, you may well find your best itinerary will connect through one of the Gulf hubs.
Over time, nonstops in such ultra-long-range planes as the newest 787s may erode the connecting markets, but only a few will have enough traffic to support daily nonstops. And the big Gulf carriers hope to pick up much of the rest.
(Send e-mail to Ed Perkins at eperkins(at)mind.net. Perkins' new book for small business and independent professionals, "Business Travel When It's Your Money," is now available through http://www.mybusinesstravel.com or http://www.amazon.com)