For most school kids, a bowl of cereal and milk or a hot egg sandwich on a neighbor's desk would be no big deal.
But for students with food allergies such as first-grader Nathan Sodolski, splashed milk or spilled egg on his desk could result in hives or even a trip to the hospital.
"It was unbelievable to me that they would suggest bringing all those allergens into the classroom," said Nathan's mother, Cindi Sodolski. "But when I realized that this policy isn't going away, I decided we have to speak up."
Other complaints include lost class time (about 45 school hours a year), kids eating a second breakfast unapproved by parents and huge amounts of food and packaging waste. All the parents who spoke to the Tribune said they strongly support feeding hungry kids but believe there are better and safer ways to do it, such as promoting the free breakfasts now served in some school cafeterias before class.
The school board passed the measure less than 72 hours after many parents and principals discovered it on the meeting agenda. By then they had already collected more than 1,000 signatures opposing it.
Several parents showed up at another board meeting Wednesday to offer emotional appeals for the district to rethink the safety and wisdom of the program.
Nancy Huetteman, whose 9-year-old son is allergic to nuts, cited the death of a seventh-grader who suffered a severe allergic reaction to peanuts in take-out food ordered for a class party late last year.
"Why we are going to risk the death of another CPS student because of allergies is beyond me," said Huetteman, a mother of three Bell Elementary students.
Breakfast in the Classroom programs have been rolling out across the nation for several years now, but Chicago's mandate is the biggest, fastest and strictest in the nation. In some Colorado schools, administrators addressed the class time issue by starting the day 15 minutes earlier. In Washington and San Diego they required the program only for schools with poverty levels higher than 40 percent and 80 percent, respectively.
Chicago parents and principals from higher-income schools — the source of most of the opposition — have asked for similar considerations, but CPS has offered little change.
District spokeswoman Monique Bond said the breakfast program, scheduled to roll out to 491 schools by June. has been going well in those that have adopted it.
"We have been extremely pleased with the three-year implementation process in over 200 schools," Bond said. "As a result of our outreach with parents, principals and students, we have gained valuable feedback and continue to improve our program."
She noted that officials had agreed after meeting with parents not to serve peanut products at breakfast.
But Sodolski said she was outraged when she heard that officials at the meeting had indicated that students, not adults, will clean the desks after breakfast. That, she said, would violate her son's mandated 504 Plan to accommodate his allergy, considered a disability.
"When I heard that they suggested kids wash tables to make cleanup time fun, I thought, 'They just don't get it,'" said Sodolski, whose son attends Bell.
Dr. Kelly Newhall at the Chicago Family Asthma and Allergy medical practice said the classroom breakfasts are especially risky for young children "because egg, milk and wheat allergies are more common among younger children, and these are the same children who are most likely to put their hands in their mouths."
She also worries about undetected allergies, noting that "25 percent of children who have no known food allergies have their first reaction at school." Experts estimate that about 4 percent of children suffer from food allergies.
"If they want to serve breakfast to all children," Newhall said, "I would recommend they keep the food in the cafeteria." In lunchrooms, kids with allergies often sit at designated tables.
In an interview, CPS parent Joy Mollet said she was appalled by the classroom breakfast program offered by her children's public preschool and does not want to see it at their grade school, Hawthorne Scholastic Academy.
"The waste is unbelievable because there is so little time and the food can be unappetizing," said Mollet, who has three children at Hawthorne. "On top of that, my children were eating breakfast at home and then had to sit down again to another one."
Hawthorne PTA president Laura Durudogan sent a letter Tuesday to school board president Mary Richardson-Lowry making a case for allowing the school to opt out of the program. With a low-income rate of just 16.4 percent (compared with 86 percent for the district), Durudogan said the small school is able to meet hunger needs with a free breakfast program offered before class starts.
Northwestern University education professor and Nettelhorst School parent Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach also thinks schools should be able to opt out. But "with one of the shortest instructional days in the nation, I don't want to see any school — especially those who might need class time the most — lose more." She advocates finding a way to make up for lost time across the board.
Many critics also wonder if a teacher can really get children to grab and eat breakfast, then clean up effectively, within 15 minutes.
At McAuliffe Elementary, which started the program in 2007, principal David Pino said it is possible, though students don't always finish their food. He also said teachers can use the time to take attendance or even read to students while they eat.
Most of his teachers opposed the program initially, Pino said, but today it has become "part of the culture. One teacher even saw how hungry the kids were and she said, 'Shame on us for resisting.'"
Pino acknowledges that his school has only one child with an allergy issue and serves a student body that is 98 percent low income. "But even in the more affluent schools, parents are in a hurry to get to work and there isn't always time to make breakfast," he said.
Kim Lutz, who has a son with food allergies at Bell, said she feels cautiously optimistic about working with CPS on a joint solution.
"But if my son ever got hurt, my conciliatory nature would be gone," she said. "We would sue CPS and it would cost them a lot of money."
Tribune reporter Cynthia Dizikes contributed.
Some CPS parents object to mandatory classroom breakfasts
Critics cite wasted time and food and greater risk for children with allergies.
Cindi Sodolski says she worried about the "Breakfast in the Classroom" program due her son, Nate's, food allergies. (Terrence Antonio James/Tribune)